The growing demand for immediate and real-time communication and updates in a crisis can be overwhelming. This overwhelming pressure can lead to mistakes, or worse, unethical decisions.
So how can you meet this demand while not compromising – but rather enhancing – your crisis management? Read on to find out…
First thing’s first, what does “real-time communication” mean?
Real-time means real-time. The truth is that the sooner you respond to a crisis, the sooner you can begin to regain control and position your organization as the credible source of information. FYI, this needs to be one of your crisis management goals.
For best results, you should aim to enable your team to respond to a crisis within 15 – 60 minutes from the time it develops an online presence. Note that I did not say from the time you become aware of the crisis, but rather from the time it develops an online presence.
Failing to do this will make your crisis management job harder. Like it or not, it is in your organization’s best interest to meet this demand. But it’s not as hard as it may seem.
People don’t expect you to have all the answers in 15 minutes
The truth is that people don’t expect you to have all the answers within 15 – 60 minutes. What they expect (and demand) of you is a response. To communicate. To let them know that you’re aware of the situation, that you’re taking it seriously and that you can be relied on for further communication and updates, in real-time, as you know more.
Is the whole 15 – 60 minutes challenge sounding more reasonable to you now?
The best part is that once you realize the benefits of responding to a crisis in real-time and understand what your audiences expect within those responses, you can prepare your response drafts (holding statements) in advance. Preparing your first response statement in advance allows you to meet the need of immediacy, and begin to position your organization as the voice of authority and calm within the crisis. It also helps eliminate long approval processes that will work against you.
Creating your first response statement
Note: What I am describing here is your first response statement, not your official crisis response.
Within your first response, your audience wants to hear four things from your organization. The four things your audiences want to know within the initial minutes of a crisis are:
1) That you are aware of the situation.
This alone will allow you to stop all of those “did you know?” and “are you aware?” messages from flooding your channels, inbox and phone line.
2) That you’re in the process of: looking into it; assessing the damage; getting to the root of how it happened; working with authorities; or whatever the right messaging is.
This part of your statement tells your audiences that you’re taking the situation seriously and acting responsibly. This is an important message to communicate. Let them know what you’re doing and why.
3) That they can expect to hear from you as soon as you have more information.
This is how you begin to position your organization as the credible source of information. If your audiences know that you are committed to keeping them updated, they won’t need to turn to third party platforms for news on the breaking crisis. In addition, you’ll want to let them know when they can expect another update, and on what platforms you’re dedicated to providing those updates (don’t forget to include appropriate links).
From there, be sure to follow through. If you promised an update at 11am, for example, and if at 11am there’s no new news to report, come back and say so – and promise the next update.
4) Last, but in no way least, your first response – and every subsequent response and communication – needs to be communicated sincerely, honestly, and compassionately.
Remember that you are humans speaking with humans. Remember that people are upset and/or worried. Be the voice of calm, authority and compassion. Be honest in all of your communications and ALWAYS focus on building / strengthening the relationships you share with your stakeholders. Focusing on relationship-building will always lead you in the right direction.
What channels do you need to communicate on?
Prior to a crisis or emergency, part of your prep work is to identify your stakeholder groups (both internal and external) and to assess and determine how and where each group likes to receive important information. This collected data will lead you to the answer to this question.
Additionally, you also need to be conscious and aware of where the conversations are taking place about the crisis. Those channels (if different from the ones already identified) will also be important to disseminate your information and updates to, in real-time.
Who on your team should be responsible for publishing these communications and updates?
Is it your frontline and regular social media team that will be assigned the task of communicating in real-time throughout the crisis? If so, who will feed them these communications and message points? What are the trigger points that determine that a situation needs to be escalated and, that perhaps, a member of your crisis team needs to take over? This is an important discussion to have internally, prior to a crisis striking.
Today’s demand for immediacy can be horribly overwhelming
Today’s demand for immediacy and communication can quickly become an overwhelming challenge. But when you have the right tools, plans and people in place, and when you truly understand your audiences’s expectations of your organization in a crisis, this demand becomes less overwhelming and more manageable. It is your responsibility to make it manageable and, in doing so, if you’re smart enough to make your responsibilities less time consuming (i.e.: by having your first response statement and others prepared in advance), all the more power to you!
Author of Crisis Ready: Building an Invincible Brand in an Uncertain World, Melissa Agnes is a leading authority on crisis preparedness, reputation management, and brand protection. Agnes is a coveted keynote speaker, commentator, and advisor to some of today’s leading organizations faced with the greatest risks. Learn more about Melissa and her work here.
Monica says
Excellent overview of Crisis Communications 101, Melissa. I've always coached to have your first message out within the first hour of the crisis occurring, even if it's just to say you're looking into the situation. At least then you've acknowledged there is something going on and you are working on it. By having a well-prepared crisis communications plan in order before, you can save so much time when a crisis hits.
Melissa Agnes says
You can save time, as well as prevent a whole lot of mistakes, panic and delays. So important to be prepared in advance. Thanks for weighing in, Monica! Glad to hear you've been coaching your clients on best practices.
Mike Dixon says
Great info. From a public safety point of view, when major events and disasters occur there will be a social media conversation that won't wait for a press conference or the next news cycle (if there is such a thing). In my opinion, social media response time will become as measurable of a metric of response effectiveness as the time it takes to deploy resources and activate systems.
Melissa Agnes says
You're spot on, Mike. The public's demand for immediacy, and the fact that they turn to trusted sources (be it their police department, fire department, city, etc.) for answers, direction and security in an emergency is growing and needs to be met. Delayed responses – or worse, no responses – can result in fear, panic and increased death counts. Social media is an important means of emergency communication that must be real-time and two-way.
Marcel Bruin says
Very useful information, I will share this with my colleagues. I am looking forward Melissa to read about your opinion what and what not needs to be communicated in the first official crisis response that follows on this first respond statement.
Melissa Agnes says
Hi Macel, I’ve written about that topic many times. The latest is in this week’s podcast. Here’s a link: http://melissaagnes.com/tcip-049-what-makes-a-good-crisis-message-with-karen-freberg-and-kristin-saling/
I hope you find it insightful.
Best,
Melissa
Marcel Bruin says
Melissa I listen to this broadcast and found it very useful. As I work in an large IT organization I will show you the main lines what we communicate to our customer.
Besides the guidelines F.01 Communicate Quickly F.02 Be Credible F.03 Be Accurate F.04 Be Simple F.05 Be Complete F.06 Communicate Broadly we build our official crisis response in the following steps:
1. Crisis Information: (current and last information we know, basically a short description of the Major Incident)
Example:
Central Mainframe has issues impacting several Business Services
2. Impact: ( here we describe more in detail the impact)
Example:
Employees encounter issues in uploading file (yearly reports, etc)
Increasingly credit applications can not be finalized
etc.
3. Status
Root cause failing emergency restart found.
Code error. Solution available in PTF (fix).
If we know the outlook for fixing the issue we describe it here
etc.
4. Actions
Close monitoring applications that are not impacted at the moment.
Prepare action plan on implementation of solution PTF (fix)
Define communication for end users, (what ever is needed)
etc
5. Incident Code we have 5 stages of a situation, Green (Normal situation) /Yellow (Serious incident) /Amber (Major Incident) / Red (Critical incident) /Black (Disaster)
Example:
Amber (Major Incident)
6. Next Call and Information
The time we have next call or when we sent the next message
Melissa Agnes says
Thanks for sharing this, Marcel. Looks like a good framework for internal crisis processing and keeping people informed and on track.